
Calendar management is a core EA function, and Athena's blog emphasizes the need for assistants who can prioritize systematically and 'push back professionally' when needed. This tests your logical thinking under pressure.
Outline a step-by-step process: (1) Check the executive's priorities and any previous communication about the meetings. (2) Look for flexibility, can one meeting be shifted, shortened, or delegated? (3) Use tools like Google Calendar's 'Find a Time' or Doodle polls to suggest alternatives. (4) Communicate clearly and respectfully with all parties, explaining the conflict and your proposed solution, not just the problem. If it's a take-home test, walk through a mock conflict with real tools.
Check the executive's stated priorities or any prior guidance on which meeting matters more, for example an external client meeting versus an internal team sync. Look for flexibility on either side, ask whether one meeting can be shortened, moved earlier or later, or attended by someone else on the executive's behalf for part of it. Use scheduling tools, such as a calendar app's meeting-time suggestions or a simple polling tool, to identify alternative slots that work for all parties before proposing a change. Communicate the conflict and your proposed solution clearly to both meeting organizers, presenting an actual recommendation rather than just flagging the problem, and confirm the final decision with your executive before locking anything in.
Filipino candidates sometimes automatically defer to the more senior person or say 'I will ask my boss what to do.' Athena wants proactive problem-solving. Don't say 'Bahala na si sir/ma'am kung anong gusto nila,' because executive partners are expected to 'see around corners.' Instead, demonstrate you would research priorities, propose alternatives, and only then involve the executive with a clear recommendation, not an open-ended question.
Situation
When I was a student organization officer, we once double-booked the university auditorium for our major fundraising gala and an inter-college debate tournament on the same night. Both events were high-stake and had external sponsors.
Task
I had to resolve the conflict without losing either opportunity and preserve relationships with the venue management and both event teams.
Action
First, I gathered all the unchangeable constraints: the debate's strict 6 PM to 8 PM slot due to judges' availability, and the gala's dinner service which couldn't start before 7 PM. I proposed splitting the venue using the foyer for cocktails from 6:30 PM then moving into the main hall at 8 PM after the debate cleared. I created two revised event timelines in Google Sheets with color-coded setups, presented both options via a quick Zoom call with the stakeholders, and secured email confirmations from all parties. I also negotiated with the janitorial team for a faster turnaround between events by offering a small additional fee from the gala budget.
Result
Both events succeeded. The debate ended on time at 8 PM, and the gala started at 8:15 PM with positive feedback from attendees who enjoyed abbreviated cocktails. The venue manager was impressed enough to offer our organization priority booking for the next year. We even saved 15% on the budget by sharing some AV equipment.
Scheduling conflicts aren't about saying no; they're about creative sequencing, transparent communication, and understanding what's truly non-negotiable for each party.
Write your own answer, then get instant AI feedback graded against:
Get AI feedback on your answer — free.
3 free AI-graded answers + 1 free mock interview, no card needed.
Sign Up FreeAlready have an account? Log in
Sign in to join the conversation.
No answers shared yet — be the first to show how you'd approach this.