This question evaluates the candidate's analytical ability, commercial acumen, and courage to make unpopular decisions that impact the bottom line, critical for brand managers who must continuously optimize their product portfolio in a competitive FMCG environment.
Describe a structured decision-making process: start with the data (sales, brand health, P&L), evaluate alternatives, build a business case, and manage stakeholder communication. Show that you balance consumer loyalty with commercial reality.
Start by grounding your answer in the numbers that actually move your P&L, not just top-line sales. Explain that you looked at volume trends over at least six to twelve months, gross margin contribution, and the cost to serve, including trade spend and warehousing. If you had brand health data like repeat purchase rates or share of market, mention those too, because they show you are thinking about consumer demand, not just revenue. Say plainly that you ran a simple scenario: what happens to the total portfolio if this SKU absorbs 20 percent of your marketing budget but only delivers 5 percent of contribution. Then walk through how you made the case to leadership, and be honest that you did not frame it as killing a product but as reallocating resources to a faster-growing line. Acknowledge the emotional pushback, especially in a Philippine context where distributors and sales teams may have personal ties to a long-standing brand, and say you addressed that by showing the opportunity cost in peso terms. Finally, state the outcome you measured, whether that was improved portfolio profitability or a smoother phase-out plan, so the interviewer sees you closed the loop with results.
Sometimes candidates hesitate, saying 'Sayang naman, baka kaya pa i-revive,' without relying on data. Over-attachment to a dying SKU drains resources. You need to be comfortable making evidence-based termination decisions for the good of the total portfolio.
Situation
In my role as brand manager for a personal care line, one of our mid-tier shampoo SKUs had been declining in sales volume for three consecutive quarters despite promotional support. Our P&L showed its contribution margin was negative after accounting for trade spend.
Task
I had to make a recommendation to either revamp the SKU or discontinue it, and if discontinuation was the right call, manage the exit without alienating our retail partners or leaving loyal consumers stranded.
Action
I gathered data: sell-out data from retail audits, consumer panel data showing a permanent shift to another brand, and a brand health tracker indicating declining brand relevance for that variant. I built a P&L scenario comparing the cost of keeping it (with necessary reformulation) versus discontinuing and reallocating resources to our faster-growing premium range. I presented the case to the marketing director with clear numbers: discontinuation would free up 15% of our trade marketing budget and improve category profitability by 5% overall. I then worked with sales to develop a phase-out plan, offering a limited-time transition pack, and communicating with top retailers to replace the shelf space with our new line.
Result
The SKU was phased out within two quarters. The freed-up budget helped accelerate the premium line, which grew by 20% in the following year. We retained all key retailer relationships and experienced no negative PR.
Letting go of underperforming products based on rigorous data, instead of emotional attachment, can free resources for higher-return opportunities.
Write your own answer, then get instant AI feedback graded against:
Get AI feedback on your answer — free.
3 free AI-graded answers + 1 free mock interview, no card needed.
Sign Up FreeAlready have an account? Log in
Sign in to join the conversation.
No answers shared yet — be the first to show how you'd approach this.